Petitie 1000+ Tech-giganten incl. Musk en Apple-oprichter Wozniak: "Pauzeer ontwikkeling AI"
Wow, niet de minsten
Na de toekomst van eenzaamheid, pornografie, rouw, nasynchronisatie, oogcontact, fotomodellen/fotografen, Facial Motion Capture, het "nu al niet meerte beheersen" GPT-4 en Midjourney v5 beginnen de captains of industry het toch tijd voor een adempauze te vinden.
We citeren maar gewoon even uit de petitie:
"*Contemporary AI systems are now becoming human-competitive at general tasks,[3] and we must ask ourselves: Should we let machines flood our information channels with propaganda and untruth? Should we automate away all the jobs, including the fulfilling ones? Should we develop nonhuman minds that might eventually outnumber, outsmart, obsolete and replace us? Should we risk loss of control of our civilization? Such decisions must not be delegated to unelected tech leaders. Powerful AI systems should be developed only once we are confident that their effects will be positive and their risks will be manageable. *
This confidence must be well justified and increase with the magnitude of a system's potential effects. OpenAI's recent statement regarding artificial general intelligence, states that "At some point, it may be important to get independent review before starting to train future systems, and for the most advanced efforts to agree to limit the rate of growth of compute used for creating new models." We agree. That point is now.
Therefore, we call on all AI labs to immediately pause for at least 6 months the training of AI systems more powerful than GPT-4*. This pause should be public and verifiable, and include all key actors. If such a pause cannot be enacted quickly, governments should step in and institute a moratorium.*
AI labs and independent experts should use this pause to jointly develop and implement a set of shared safety protocols for advanced AI design and development that are rigorously audited and overseen by independent outside experts. These protocols should ensure that systems adhering to them are safe beyond a reasonable doubt.[4] This does not mean a pause on AI development in general, merely a stepping back from the dangerous race to ever-larger unpredictable black-box models with emergent capabilities."
Wat vindt u, de kenner, ervan?
"Go inward"
Wint Apple de AI race uiteindelijk?
Full discussion on Apple LLMs here (including this rebuttal): https://t.co/8UZiS3PhI5 pic.twitter.com/Om7Rkt52IZ
— Trung Phan (@TrungTPhan) March 24, 2023
Reaguursels
Dit wil je ook lezen
Paper door OpenAI en University of Pennsylvania: Deze banen worden het meest bedreigd door GPTs
Prof. dr. Hans Jansen (vzmh) schreef het al: u wordt vervangen.
"GPT-4 nu al niet meer te beheersen, schrijft eigen ontsnapping en overname computer in Python"
Brisant draadje door Stanford-professor Computational Psychology Michal Kosinski
Elon Musk: 'Robots beginnen Derde Wereldoorlog'
Zodra Johnny 5 zijn voorgeprogammeerde tengels op een spreekwoordenboek weet te leggen, gaan we allemaal dood.